January Edition
Hunger: An Implicit Weapon in the Theater of War
By: Laavanyaa Joshi
Edited by: Nishtha Chakravarty
Illustrated by: Deepshikha Banerjee
In the cold corridors of history, war has often been portrayed as a clash of armies, an exchange of artillery, and a contest of strategies. Yet, behind the sound of gunfire lies a far more insidious weapon, one that leaves no smoke trails or craters but carves deep scars into the fabric of humanity: hunger. The weaponisation of hunger is a grim reality, a tactic as old as conflict itself, wielded to decimate morale, break resistance, and, often, annihilate entire communities.
From ancient sieges to modern blockades, controlling food supplies has been a powerful tool of subjugation. In medieval times, besieging forces cut off access to food and water, forcing starvation upon fortified cities. Fast forward to the 20th century, and we find the Nazi Hunger Plan, which aimed to starve millions in Eastern Europe to secure food resources for Germany. Today, this sinister tactic persists in conflict zones, where hunger is not just a consequence of war but a deliberate weapon.
There would be weaponisation of hunger such that the suffering of these unheard, whose lives anyway were precarious in times of peace and rendered invisible in times of war, now find voices louder. Children, who might else otherwise learn in classrooms, now encounter the gnawing feeling of hunger. Mothers go deciding which child to feed with what scraps to save and those elderly people, often to be forgotten, quietly went under, their stories unbroadcast. These voices, silenced by starvation and overlooked by the global community, are a haunting testament to humanity's failure to protect its most vulnerable.
For instance, in Yemen, hunger has been so well employed to the devastating effects of a pinpointed fashion. Decades of blockade and agriculture-infrastructure destruction pushed millions of people into famine-like situations. Food aid that keeps alive many, on a control basis, is distributed sparingly, curtailed, or entirely denied in selected zones as part of the control mechanism. The deprivation calculated by the weapon users is no collateral damage; it's strategy. The besiegment of Syria's Aleppo and Eastern Ghouta towns was equally based on starvation to force a submission to this strategy.
Hunger as a weapon is terrifyingly effective because it attacks the most vulnerable: children, the elderly, and the already marginalized. It creates a cascading crisis—malnutrition leads to disease, displacement fuels chaos, and the collapse of food systems ensures prolonged suffering even after the guns fall silent. Unlike bullets or bombs, the effects of hunger endure for generations, stunting not just bodies but entire futures.
Why does the international community allow this crime to continue? Laws exist—the Geneva Conventions, for example, ban starvation as a tool of war—yet there is no strength in enforcing them. Humanitarian aid often finds itself caught between the hammer and the anvil of politics as parties to conflict use denial of access to gain leverage. Millions of lives become mere pawns on the chessboard of power. Among these millions are countless unheard voices, crying out for food, dignity, and recognition.
Yet, in this dark narrative, there is space for hope. Advocacy groups, humanitarian organizations, and whistleblowers continue to expose and challenge the weaponization of hunger. It is the responsibility of the international community to amplify these voices, make perpetrators accountable, and build frameworks to protect civilians.
Listening to the voices of the unheard is not merely an act of compassion; it is a moral imperative. They are the refugees recounting stories of empty fields and barren kitchens. They are the mothers, the children, and the elderly, whose resilience shines despite unimaginable hardships. Their testimonies must drive action—not pity—to dismantle the systems that perpetuate hunger as a weapon.
The weaponization of hunger is a stark reminder of the fact that the costs of war go far, far beyond the battlefields. It is a clarion call to all of us to demand accountability, support humanitarian efforts, and never let the voices of the starving go unheeded. As we reflect on the theme of this month's magazine, "Voices of the Unheard," let us amplify the cries of those silenced by hunger and resolve to transform their suffering into a rallying cry for justice.
Hunger must cease to be a weapon. It must return to its rightful place: as a fundamental human right, not a tool of war.
.png)
Hope.
By: Bipasha Bhattacharyya
Illustrated by: Deepshikha Banerjee
The news says, the Arctics would live ice-free summers, by the time we are (definitely) having a midlife crisis. Sometimes, it becomes perturbing, how the planet, Earth, and maybe even Mars, and who knows which other planet, or universe, have been fracturing for hundreds of centuries, now. Resistance is breathing, like a wildfire, from the rebellion of Afghans, to the Iranian classrooms, their hair flowing like banners of revolt. The trees of Congo are humming a cry of those, who are bearing the weight of forgotten wars. Popular culture ceases to be popular, because the rich have decided to conquer the profits, sell the vulnerabilities. While love stays political, we read poetries of Hemingway; while we synthesise ecofeminism of the imperil mangroves, the once glorified Persian empire perpetuates to fall under the ruins off neo-colonialism. The birds stopped migrating, and Mahmood Darwish failed to erase the politicisations in his poetry.
​
The blood of the soil turned black off insurgencies. The sweat of the refugee camps runs dry off the smoke. While we switch channels to find the voices of humanity, a flame, a future, in courts of law, in the press-conferences, the seeds of defiance do not fruit. Wildflowers do not bloom. Journalism, the supposed watchdog, is caught in a web of sensationalism, reducing complex conflicts to digestible headlines. The people in power know what’s happening. The public knows what’s happening. The refugee camps are not temporary blips; they are an exacerbation of conflicts, and wars, and femicides.The fires in the Amazon are not an anomaly; they are the inevitable outcome of a world that values profit over preservation. And yet, the most we can muster is outrage for a few days, maybe a week, before we move on to the next trending issue, while the graffitis erode off the natural disasters. Take a look - we have not failed with regards to politics and economy, we have failed in transpiring humanity; it's a failure of empathy.
​
The trust says, the world is not broken, it is certainly working in a way, perhaps it had been designed to work. It began with Carthage, and perpetuates in the alleys and borders of Ukraine and Myanmar.
​
Change is not about waiting for a moment of grandeur; it is about the small, collective actions we take every day. It is about our presence, when it is inconvenient. It is about screaming of injustice, louder than ever, louder for those in the back. We are the witnesses to the global struggles for agency, but the question is will we be bystanders, or will we stand up and reclaim that agency for ourselves? It’s time to stop pretending that it’s all someone else’s problem. The world is ours to change. But it won’t happen unless we’re ready to push back against the complacency that keeps us stuck in the same old cycles. We have the power to break it. But only if we’re willing to fight for it - consistently, relentlessly, and with the unwavering belief that real change is not just possible, but necessary.
​
Can we colour the tents of refugees with unfeigned hope? Can we truly rewrite our histories?
.png)